MyCompetitiveExams Logo MyCompetitiveExams
MyCompetitiveExams Logo MyCompetitiveExams
Search 1,140+ Questions
Chapters, formulas, speed tricks
→
⚡ Brahmastra NEET 2027
720 MARKS

Dynamic 180-question full-length simulator mixed dynamically from all 6 years for 2027 & 2026 aspirants.

Launch Brahmastra 2027 Test →
Start Practice →
100% Free · No Login Required
Q.39 Botany ⭐ 360° Option Elimination Active
Vault ↗

NEET 2020 Botany Question 39 Solution

Topic: Evolution · Official NTA Booklet Code E1
NEET 2020 Botany Question 39: Embryological Support for Evolution Disapproved by Karl Ernst von Baer

Question

Embryological support for evolution was disapproved by:

  1. (1)Karl Ernst von Baer
  2. (2)Alfred Wallace
  3. (3)Charles Darwin
  4. (4)Oparin
✓
Verified Against NTA Final Answer Key
Option (1) : Karl Ernst von Baer
📚 Evolution Easy
📋 Given Parameters & Problem Setup
Hypothesis Embryological support for evolution (Ernst Haeckel: Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny)
Question Objective Identify the scientist who disapproved/refuted this hypothesis
⚡

The 30-Second Exam Hall Shortcut: ⚡ "Haeckel Proposed, Karl Ernst von Baer Disapproved!"

⏱️ 25 seconds

Ernst Haeckel proposed embryological support for evolution based on the observation that embryos resemble ancestral forms. Karl Ernst von Baer carefully observed that embryos NEVER pass through the adult stages of other animals, disproving Haeckel! Mark Option (1) in 5 seconds.

1 Embryological evidence was proposed by Ernst Haeckel.
2 It was disapproved based on careful embryological observation by Karl Ernst von Baer.
3 Select Option (1).
🛡️
Why You Can 100% Trust This Shortcut: NCERT Biology · Evolution (Evidences for Evolution: Embryological Support)
📐

Step-by-Step Rigorous Workflow & Mathematical Proof

Step 1

Ernst Haeckel's Embryological Proposal

Ernst Haeckel proposed embryological support for evolution based on the observation of certain embryonic features common to all vertebrates (such as vestigial gill slits in early human embryos) that are absent in adults (Biogenetic law: Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny).

Step 2

Von Baer's Refutation

This proposal was disapproved by Karl Ernst von Baer on the basis of careful comparative observation: he noted that embryos never pass through the adult stages of other animals.

Step 3

Review Other Scientists in Options

Alfred Wallace worked in the Malay Archipelago and independently conceived natural selection; Charles Darwin authored On the Origin of Species; Alexander Oparin proposed the biochemical origin of life from coacervates.

Step 4

Conclude Correct Scientist

Karl Ernst von Baer is the definitive scientist who disapproved the embryological hypothesis as stated in NCERT.

⭐

360° Option Elimination Engine Key Feature

Diagnose every choice: Know exactly why the right option works and why distractors fail.

4-Option Deep Scan
1 A
✓ 100% Correct
Verdict & Scientific Reason:

Factually exact; Karl Ernst von Baer definitively rejected Haeckel's biogenetic proposal.

💡
Why this is airtight: None; direct textbook citation.
2 B
✗ Incorrect
Verdict & Scientific Reason:

Incorrect; Wallace was a co-discoverer of natural selection, not the embryologist who refuted Haeckel.

⚠️
Student Fallacy (Why candidates pick this trap): Confusing contributors to natural selection theory.
3 C
✗ Incorrect
Verdict & Scientific Reason:

Incorrect; Darwin actually utilized embryological similarities as supporting evidence for common descent.

⚠️
Student Fallacy (Why candidates pick this trap): Defaulting to Darwin for any evolutionary question.
4 D
✗ Incorrect
Verdict & Scientific Reason:

Incorrect; Oparin proposed the biochemical coacervate theory of the origin of life.

⚠️
Student Fallacy (Why candidates pick this trap): Confusing chemical evolution theorists with comparative embryologists.
⚠️

NTA Trap Alert: Proposed vs Disapproved Wording

Haeckel PROPOSED embryological support; Karl Ernst von Baer DISAPPROVED it.

🛡️ How to avoid the -1 mark: Read the operative verb carefully: If it says "proposed", think Haeckel. If it says "disapproved", answer Karl Ernst von Baer!
📖

Core NEET Syllabus Standard

Botany · Evolution Standard Benchmark
Core Scientific Principle Tested:

""

Syllabus Focus: Embryological Support for Evolution Disapproved by Karl Ernst von Baer
✓ Core NEET UG Syllabus Anchor Syllabus & Academic Standards ↗

Ready to attempt under real exam pressure?

Test your speed and accuracy in the authentic 180-minute timed NTA simulator.

Launch NEET 2020 CBT Test →

Spotted a mistake in this solution? Report an error ([email protected])

⚖️ Legal & Fair Dealing Notice: Sourced from publicly released NEET 2020 question papers and NEET answer keys for private study, research, and non-commercial educational practice under Fair Dealing (Section 52(1)(a) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957). Not affiliated with or endorsed by NTA or NMC.

Solve 4 NEET Questions a Day — One per Subject

Cover all 1,140 official NEET questions in 285 days at your own pace. Progress is saved on your device. No login needed.